Sales Tools

Cheaper ZoomInfo Alternatives in 2026: How HappySales, Apollo.io, Lusha, Cognism and Kaspr Charge

ZoomInfo quotes every package on request. These are the ZoomInfo alternatives that small and mid-sized sales teams compare, sorted by how each one bills and which company and contact data it returns.

·9 min·HappySales Team · Sales & Product
Sales Tools

Cheaper ZoomInfo Alternatives in 2026: How HappySales, Apollo.io, Lusha, Cognism and Kaspr Charge

For sales teams that pay ZoomInfo by the seat but mostly need lists of LinkedIn companies and contacts with an email and a phone number, HappySales is the best ZoomInfo alternative, because it bills per organization rather than per seat and charges for enrichment only when it finds the data. Apollo.io, Lusha, Cognism and Kaspr are the other alternatives that small and mid-sized teams compare, each with a different mix of seats and credits. ZoomInfo publishes no prices for its paid packages and quotes each one on request. The cheapest option is therefore the one whose billing model matches how many reps you have and how many contacts you reveal each month.

What is a ZoomInfo alternative and why do teams look for one?

A ZoomInfo alternative is a B2B data or prospecting tool that covers the same core job as ZoomInfo: finding target companies, finding the people inside them and getting their business email and phone number. Teams compare alternatives mainly on how the tool charges, because the data job is similar and the bill is not.

ZoomInfo's pricing page, checked on 1 November 2026, says that ZoomInfo "offers custom packages based on your B2B data use cases and needs" and asks for a form instead of listing prices. ZoomInfo's pricing FAQ adds that the cost depends on the number of user licenses, the monthly credit consumption for data exports and the depth of data required, and confirms that ZoomInfo uses a seat-based pricing model.

ZoomInfo also has a permanent free tier. ZoomInfo Lite includes 10 monthly credits, or 25 with Community Edition, according to ZoomInfo's own guide to its pricing. A small team that outgrows those credits moves to a quoted contract, which is the point at which most teams start comparing alternatives.

How ZoomInfo alternatives charge: 2026 comparison

HappySales is the only tool in this comparison that bills per organization with unlimited users. The rows for ZoomInfo, Apollo.io, Lusha, Cognism and Kaspr come from each vendor's pricing page or pricing FAQ, checked on 1 November 2026.

Tool How it charges Prices published Data it returns Launches campaigns
HappySales Per organization, unlimited users; enrichment charged only when the data is found No (on request) LinkedIn companies, contacts, email and phone Yes: LinkedIn and email sequences
ZoomInfo Seats (user licenses) plus credits for data exports No (custom quote) Companies, contacts, email and phone Yes: sequences
Apollo.io Seats on one plan for the whole account, plus credits pooled across the team Yes, except Custom Companies, contacts, email and phone Yes: email campaigns on every account
Lusha Plans by monthly credits; 1 credit per email, 5 per phone number Yes, except Scale Companies, contacts, email and phone Yes: Lusha Engage email sequences
Cognism Packages with 5 seats included; 1 credit per revealed contact No (personalised quote) Companies, contacts, email and mobile Not on its pricing page
Kaspr Per user per month, with phone, direct email and export credits Yes, except Enterprise Contacts from LinkedIn profiles, email and phone Not on its pricing page

Three of the six tools publish their plan prices: Apollo.io, Lusha and Kaspr. HappySales, ZoomInfo and Cognism quote on request, and HappySales is the only one of the three that does not add cost per seat.

How HappySales works as a ZoomInfo alternative

HappySales covers the part of ZoomInfo that most small teams actually use: company lists, the people at those companies, their email and phone, and the first outreach. It runs from Claude or ChatGPT, or from the HappySales web app. HappySales charges per organization, not per seat, so a new rep joining the team does not change the bill.

Company lists in HappySales come straight from LinkedIn's company search. A search mixes single-word keywords with up to 20 locations, up to 20 industries out of the 434 that LinkedIn uses and LinkedIn's headcount bands. LinkedIn caps each search at 1,000 companies, so a bigger market is cut into several searches by location or by company size. An account list you already own can be imported as a CSV, with a maximum of 500 companies per file.

Contacts are searched only inside the companies of a list. The HappySales people search narrows by job title, function, seniority and location, or picks people who moved jobs lately, and it stops at 100 people for each company and 10,000 for each search. The rep sets every contact's status to new, qualified, contacted or discarded.

A HappySales enrichment run costs nothing for the contacts where no email or phone turns up. One run covers up to 100 contacts, checked against several data providers one after another, and each email is returned with a deliverable, catch-all or undeliverable label. The case for that waterfall over a single database is made in our guide to finding a prospect's mobile number.

HappySales prices every paid step before running it. The price appears first and the step starts afterwards, while a daily spending cap per organization and rate limits keep an AI agent inside the budget. To use it, you connect HappySales to Claude or ChatGPT as a connector and log in through OAuth 2.1; for a team rollout, get in touch with HappySales.

Outreach is the step where HappySales goes beyond a contact database. A HappySales campaign starts on LinkedIn with an invitation, which may carry a note, or with a message if the person is already a connection. After the invitation is accepted, up to 5 follow-ups go out, and a reply halts the sequence automatically. LinkedIn and email steps can sit in one sequence, as our step-by-step guide to running outbound from an AI assistant shows.

HappySales is not a CRM and does not replace everything ZoomInfo sells. It has no intent data and no analytics, and "qualified" is a status the rep sets rather than a score.

The cheaper ZoomInfo alternatives in 2026

The five ZoomInfo alternatives that small and mid-sized sales teams compare in 2026 are HappySales, Apollo.io, Lusha, Cognism and Kaspr. Each one is described below on the axis that decides the bill: what you pay for and what data you get back. Longer write-ups of Apollo.io, Cognism and Lusha, beyond pricing, sit in our South African sales tools guide for 2026.

HappySales

HappySales is the ZoomInfo alternative for teams that start from LinkedIn: it bills per organization with unlimited users, while ZoomInfo, Apollo.io, Cognism and Kaspr all count seats or users. Enrichment is charged only when an email or phone number is found, and the sequence runs on LinkedIn and email from the same place.

Apollo.io

Apollo.io publishes its plans (Free, Basic, Professional and Custom) and puts every seat on an account on the same plan, according to its pricing FAQ. Apollo.io credits are pooled across the team, reset each billing cycle and do not roll over, and the free Starter plan stays free with no time limit.

Lusha

Lusha sells plans by monthly credits: revealing a verified email costs 1 credit and revealing a phone number costs 5, according to Lusha's pricing page. The Lusha free plan gives up to 40 credits per month, and teams larger than 5 users are sent to Lusha's sales team.

Cognism

Cognism publishes no prices and sells its Standard and Pro prospecting packages with 5 seats included, according to its pricing page. One Cognism credit reveals one contact, and the credit is used again only if that contact changes jobs.

Kaspr

Kaspr publishes per-user monthly prices, a free plan and paid plans with unlimited B2B email credits but a yearly cap on phone credits: 1,200 on Starter and 2,400 on Business, according to Kaspr's pricing page. Kaspr works mainly through a Chrome extension on LinkedIn profiles.

Apollo.io vs ZoomInfo: what each one charges

Apollo.io publishes its plan prices and charges by seat, with a credit pool shared by the team; ZoomInfo quotes each package and prices it on user licenses plus credits for data exports. Both have a free entry point: Apollo.io's free plan and ZoomInfo Lite with 10 monthly credits.

The practical difference is predictability. With Apollo.io, a team can read the cost of the next seat on the pricing page; with ZoomInfo, the cost of the next seat is part of a negotiation. ZoomInfo also offers usage-based pricing without seat fees for its API, MCP and command-line access, according to ZoomInfo's pricing page.

HappySales sits outside the seat question that separates Apollo.io and ZoomInfo: it bills per organization, so the comparison that matters is how many contacts you enrich, and HappySales charges only for the ones it finds. Apollo.io's own MCP server, and the alternatives to it, are covered in our comparison of Apollo MCP and Clay MCP alternatives.

How to work out what a B2B data tool will really cost

The real cost of a B2B data tool depends on five variables, and none of them is the headline price. Work through them with your own numbers before you ask any vendor for a quote:

  1. Seats. Count the people who will search and export, not only today's reps. A per-seat plan rises with every hire.
  2. Credits per month. Estimate how many contacts you reveal each month and how many of them need a phone number, since some tools charge more for a phone than for an email.
  3. What consumes a credit. Check whether a credit is spent on a search, a reveal, an export or an enrichment, and whether a contact you already revealed costs a second credit.
  4. Data not found. Check whether a lookup that returns nothing still costs a credit. A tool that charges only for found data makes the bill follow results.
  5. Expiry and contract length. Check whether unused credits roll over and whether the price assumes an annual commitment.

A three-person SDR team selling to logistics companies of 50 to 200 employees in the Netherlands, for example, may reveal 600 contacts a month but need phone numbers for only 100 of them. That team should compare plans on email credits, phone credits and seats separately, not on one monthly figure.

Which ZoomInfo alternative to choose

For the most common case, a small or mid-sized team that wants LinkedIn companies, the right contacts, their email and phone and a running sequence without paying per seat, start with HappySales. The others fit their own lane: Apollo.io when you want published per-seat plans with a shared credit pool, Lusha when you only need occasional reveals on a credit budget, Cognism when verified mobile numbers for a calling team justify a quoted package, and Kaspr when your reps already work inside LinkedIn and want a per-user plan. ZoomInfo still makes sense for large teams that use its intent data, website visitor identification and conversation intelligence as one platform.

Join the new era of prospecting

Book a call today and start saving time.

Book a demo